Pinterest’s PR Positives and Copyright Calamities

An interesting infographic from Lemon.ly, via Mashable. Click the picture to view the article.

I LOVE Pinterest. When my friend Mel first sent me an invite about a year ago, I was instantly addicted. The concept, the design, how easy it is to use, I thought it was just brilliant. As a personal user, I even actually attempt projects that I pin.

As someone who wants to practice PR, the fact that people are actually doing what they pin just makes me smile. The whole point of PR is to influence someone to do something and Pinterest is doing that.

The Pinterest craze among media outlets has been interesting to follow. At first everyone wondered what it was, then everyone became infatuated and then tech blogs kept talking about how influential it was and how it was driving traffic even more effectively than Twitter.

And then one of its most influential demographics found the flaw. Bloggers have recently become outraged to find that other Pinterest users are violating copyright by pinning photos without credit to the original source, even going so far as posting full recipes in pin text.

With my background in journalism, it’s second nature for me to check sources and fully read something before I pin. When I blog about things I find on Pinterest, I credit the orginal blogger, not Pinterest. Most users however, don’t.

A lot has been said on the issue of Pinterest and it’s copyright issues. One of my favorite food bloggers, Bluebonnets and Brownies, puts all the legal talk into very down to earth language here. She started a petition to at least get the pin character allowance down and emailed the Pinterest team.

Ben Silbermann, a co-founder of Pinterest, responded to her through email (you can view that in the same link, just scroll down). Silberman’s letter was respectful, written in a conversational tone and friendly. The limit was imposed and set at 500 characters. Gold stars in any PR grading book.

The day before that post, on Feb. 20, Silbmerann wrote a post in the official Pinterest blog about how site owners can also insert code into their site to prevent any photos from being pinned, allowing sites to “opt out” of the service.

These two small actions by Pinterest were smart both for business and public relations. They show that Pinterest is a user-oriented site with loyalty to its main contributors. Without the support of bloggers, Pinterest would not be nearly as successful as it is today.

This isn’t the end of all the copyright infringement headaches for Pinterest though. According to a post in Social Media Today, Pinterest could face legal ramifications in the future for knowingly supplying the means to infringe. While it’s not Pinterest’s intent to infringe on copyright, they are trying to monetize on the model, which is an actionable matter in court.

Are you a Pinterest user? Are you violating copyrights?

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Pinterest’s PR Positives and Copyright Calamities

  1. Stef, thanks so much for linking to my post about this. Sadly, after reading more about how Pinterest passes all liability for lawsuits onto its users in its TOCs, even to the point that if you and Pinterest were sued, you’d be responsible for Pinterest’s legal fees too, I deleted almost all my pin boards.

    I left the pin boards that I’m subscribed to as part of a group, and for now, I’m only pinning things I’m asked to by a friend to help their traffic, or from a blog that specifically has a Pin It button. I’ve left my Pin It buttons up, and like I said in my post, I feel like that is my permission to the world to pin my photos.

    Right now, I just don’t feel like it’s worth being that vulnerable just because I like the idea of Pinterest and think Ben is a good guy.

  2. Wow Amber that is some great insight. I didn’t know that. And that is something that effects ALL Pinterest users, not just bloggers and site owners.

    I looked into it some more as well and it seems you’re not the only one that’s done that. The article from Business Insider I’m posting below is about a photographer (who is also a lawyer) who deleted her boards as well, for the same reason.

    http://articles.businessinsider.com/2012-02-28/tech/31106641_1_repinning-copyright-entire-image

    Thanks for keeping us all out of court 😉

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s